<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appeal Dismissed: Challenging Liquidator Fee Determination Procedure Without Contesting SCC&#039;s Actual Decision Deemed Premature</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=86517</link>
    <description>The NCLAT dismissed an appeal challenging procedural aspects of liquidator fee determination without contesting the Stakeholders&#039; Consultation Committee&#039;s (SCC) actual decision on the matter. The Tribunal held that challenging the procedure without challenging the consequential decision rendered the appeal premature and untenable. The appellant had questioned the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s directive for the SCC to determine liquidator remuneration and incidental charges, but failed to challenge the SCC&#039;s subsequent decision dated 09.01.2025. The NCLAT concluded that no cause survived regarding the impugned order&#039;s directions, as the unchallenged SCC determination had already addressed the liquidator&#039;s fees and liquidation costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2025 08:41:26 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2025 08:41:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=806465" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appeal Dismissed: Challenging Liquidator Fee Determination Procedure Without Contesting SCC&#039;s Actual Decision Deemed Premature</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=86517</link>
      <description>The NCLAT dismissed an appeal challenging procedural aspects of liquidator fee determination without contesting the Stakeholders&#039; Consultation Committee&#039;s (SCC) actual decision on the matter. The Tribunal held that challenging the procedure without challenging the consequential decision rendered the appeal premature and untenable. The appellant had questioned the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s directive for the SCC to determine liquidator remuneration and incidental charges, but failed to challenge the SCC&#039;s subsequent decision dated 09.01.2025. The NCLAT concluded that no cause survived regarding the impugned order&#039;s directions, as the unchallenged SCC determination had already addressed the liquidator&#039;s fees and liquidation costs.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2025 08:41:26 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=86517</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>