Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
HC invalidated reassessment proceedings initiated under s148A(b) based on alleged bogus capital expenses identified through CRIU/VRU information. Revenue's physical verification and subsequent order under s148A(d) violated natural justice principles as assessee was not given opportunity to respond to allegations regarding non-existent entity. Court emphasized that post original assessment closure, AO becomes functus officio and jurisdiction for reassessment requires proper disclosure of incriminating material to assessee. Physical verification findings about entity's non-existence at Jasola address were not communicated via show cause notice, making the reassessment proceedings procedurally defective. Order set aside in assessee's favor.
HC invalidated reassessment proceedings initiated under s148A(b) based on alleged bogus capital expenses identified through CRIU/VRU information. Revenue's physical verification and subsequent order under s148A(d) violated natural justice principles as assessee was not given opportunity to respond to allegations regarding non-existent entity. Court emphasized that post original assessment closure, AO becomes functus officio and jurisdiction for reassessment requires proper disclosure of incriminating material to assessee. Physical verification findings about entity's non-existence at Jasola address were not communicated via show cause notice, making the reassessment proceedings procedurally defective. Order set aside in assessee's favor.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
