<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tax Officer&#039;s Reassessment Under Section 148A Invalid Due To Non-Disclosure Of Physical Verification Findings To Assessee</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85902</link>
    <description>HC invalidated reassessment proceedings initiated under s148A(b) based on alleged bogus capital expenses identified through CRIU/VRU information. Revenue&#039;s physical verification and subsequent order under s148A(d) violated natural justice principles as assessee was not given opportunity to respond to allegations regarding non-existent entity. Court emphasized that post original assessment closure, AO becomes functus officio and jurisdiction for reassessment requires proper disclosure of incriminating material to assessee. Physical verification findings about entity&#039;s non-existence at Jasola address were not communicated via show cause notice, making the reassessment proceedings procedurally defective. Order set aside in assessee&#039;s favor.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2025 08:02:33 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2025 08:02:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=799643" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tax Officer&#039;s Reassessment Under Section 148A Invalid Due To Non-Disclosure Of Physical Verification Findings To Assessee</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85902</link>
      <description>HC invalidated reassessment proceedings initiated under s148A(b) based on alleged bogus capital expenses identified through CRIU/VRU information. Revenue&#039;s physical verification and subsequent order under s148A(d) violated natural justice principles as assessee was not given opportunity to respond to allegations regarding non-existent entity. Court emphasized that post original assessment closure, AO becomes functus officio and jurisdiction for reassessment requires proper disclosure of incriminating material to assessee. Physical verification findings about entity&#039;s non-existence at Jasola address were not communicated via show cause notice, making the reassessment proceedings procedurally defective. Order set aside in assessee&#039;s favor.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2025 08:02:33 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85902</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>