Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The AT upheld the provisional attachment order over the proceeds of crime. Despite the lapse of 180 days u/s 5(3) of PMLA, the period from 15.03.2020 to 28.02.2022 was excluded due to Covid-19 as per the SC's order. The property, though purchased by a non-accused entity, could be attached as it constituted proceeds of crime transferred by the accused. The appeal was dismissed, upholding the attachment orders.
The AT upheld the provisional attachment order over the proceeds of crime. Despite the lapse of 180 days u/s 5(3) of PMLA, the period from 15.03.2020 to 28.02.2022 was excluded due to Covid-19 as per the SC's order. The property, though purchased by a non-accused entity, could be attached as it constituted proceeds of crime transferred by the accused. The appeal was dismissed, upholding the attachment orders.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.