<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Attachment order upheld despite 180-day lapse due to Covid-19 exclusion period.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85061</link>
    <description>The AT upheld the provisional attachment order over the proceeds of crime. Despite the lapse of 180 days u/s 5(3) of PMLA, the period from 15.03.2020 to 28.02.2022 was excluded due to Covid-19 as per the SC&#039;s order. The property, though purchased by a non-accused entity, could be attached as it constituted proceeds of crime transferred by the accused. The appeal was dismissed, upholding the attachment orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2025 08:21:45 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2025 08:21:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=790845" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Attachment order upheld despite 180-day lapse due to Covid-19 exclusion period.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85061</link>
      <description>The AT upheld the provisional attachment order over the proceeds of crime. Despite the lapse of 180 days u/s 5(3) of PMLA, the period from 15.03.2020 to 28.02.2022 was excluded due to Covid-19 as per the SC&#039;s order. The property, though purchased by a non-accused entity, could be attached as it constituted proceeds of crime transferred by the accused. The appeal was dismissed, upholding the attachment orders.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2025 08:21:45 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85061</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>