Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Accused's conviction u/s 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act upheld. Once execution of cheque admitted, presumptions u/ss 118 and 139 raised against accused. Accused failed to rebut presumptions or establish probable defence showing no debt/liability existed on preponderance of probabilities. HC found no infirmity in trial court's findings upholding conviction. Petition dismissed.
Accused's conviction u/s 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act upheld. Once execution of cheque admitted, presumptions u/ss 118 and 139 raised against accused. Accused failed to rebut presumptions or establish probable defence showing no debt/liability existed on preponderance of probabilities. HC found no infirmity in trial court's findings upholding conviction. Petition dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.