Personal hearing requirements in GST adjudication were satisfied by prior opportunities and written submissions; appellate limitation received writ-pe...
Interactive flat panels meeting automatic data processing conditions are distinguished from monitors, while later classification clarifications apply ...
HC quashed orders rejecting assessee's request for revision u/s 264. Differential value between sale deed and stamp duty valuation exceeded Rs. 50,000, invoking Section 56(2)(vii)(b)(ii). Stamp duty valuation of Rs. 97,69,000 adopted by SRO to be considered for computing income. AO to refer valuation to Valuation Officer if disputed u/s 50C(2). Assessee can raise objections before revisional authority u/s 264 or appellate authority u/s 246A. Cases remitted to AO for fresh adjudication u/s 56(2)(vii)(c) proviso read with Section 50C(2).
HC quashed orders rejecting assessee's request for revision u/s 264. Differential value between sale deed and stamp duty valuation exceeded Rs. 50,000, invoking Section 56(2)(vii)(b)(ii). Stamp duty valuation of Rs. 97,69,000 adopted by SRO to be considered for computing income. AO to refer valuation to Valuation Officer if disputed u/s 50C(2). Assessee can raise objections before revisional authority u/s 264 or appellate authority u/s 246A. Cases remitted to AO for fresh adjudication u/s 56(2)(vii)(c) proviso read with Section 50C(2).
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
