Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
HC quashed orders rejecting assessee's request for revision u/s 264. Differential value between sale deed and stamp duty valuation exceeded Rs. 50,000, invoking Section 56(2)(vii)(b)(ii). Stamp duty valuation of Rs. 97,69,000 adopted by SRO to be considered for computing income. AO to refer valuation to Valuation Officer if disputed u/s 50C(2). Assessee can raise objections before revisional authority u/s 264 or appellate authority u/s 246A. Cases remitted to AO for fresh adjudication u/s 56(2)(vii)(c) proviso read with Section 50C(2).
HC quashed orders rejecting assessee's request for revision u/s 264. Differential value between sale deed and stamp duty valuation exceeded Rs. 50,000, invoking Section 56(2)(vii)(b)(ii). Stamp duty valuation of Rs. 97,69,000 adopted by SRO to be considered for computing income. AO to refer valuation to Valuation Officer if disputed u/s 50C(2). Assessee can raise objections before revisional authority u/s 264 or appellate authority u/s 246A. Cases remitted to AO for fresh adjudication u/s 56(2)(vii)(c) proviso read with Section 50C(2).
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
