https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84351 HC quashed orders rejecting assessee's request for revision u/s 264. Differential value between sale deed and stamp duty valuation exceeded Rs. 50,000, invoking Section 56(2)(vii)(b)(ii). Stamp duty valuation of Rs. 97,69,000 adopted by SRO to be considered for computing income. AO to refer valuation to Valuation Officer if disputed u/s 50C(2). Assessee can raise objections before revisional authority u/s 264 or appellate authority u/s 246A. Cases remitted to AO for fresh adjudication u/s 56(2)(vii)(c) proviso read with Section 50C(2). en-us Fri, 27 Dec 2024 09:00:37 +0530 Fri, 27 Dec 2024 09:00:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84351 HC quashed orders rejecting assessee's request for revision u/s 264. Differential value between sale deed and stamp duty valuation exceeded Rs. 50,000, invoking Section 56(2)(vii)(b)(ii). Stamp duty valuation of Rs. 97,69,000 adopted by SRO to be considered for computing income. AO to refer valuation to Valuation Officer if disputed u/s 50C(2). Assessee can raise objections before revisional authority u/s 264 or appellate authority u/s 246A. Cases remitted to AO for fresh adjudication u/s 56(2)(vii)(c) proviso read with Section 50C(2). Highlights Income Tax Fri, 27 Dec 2024 09:00:37 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84351