Customs Broker association membership becomes mandatory in the operating jurisdiction, with exclusive membership and limited compliance-time relaxatio...
Petitioner, a director in respondent company, challenged complaint and summoning order against her u/ss 138 and 141 of NI Act for dishonour of cheque issued to complainant. HC held petitioner prima facie liable u/s 141 as being in charge of company's affairs despite not being signatory. Mere non-signatory status didn't absolve liability if requisites u/ss 138 and 141 met. MM rightly issued summons after observing prima facie case and non-payment despite demand notice. No illegality in summoning order to warrant quashing u/s 482 of Code. Petition dismissed.
Petitioner, a director in respondent company, challenged complaint and summoning order against her u/ss 138 and 141 of NI Act for dishonour of cheque issued to complainant. HC held petitioner prima facie liable u/s 141 as being in charge of company's affairs despite not being signatory. Mere non-signatory status didn't absolve liability if requisites u/ss 138 and 141 met. MM rightly issued summons after observing prima facie case and non-payment despite demand notice. No illegality in summoning order to warrant quashing u/s 482 of Code. Petition dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
