Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Ex post facto approval granted to a respondent for foreign investment violated principles of natural justice. A committee was constituted to examine rival contentions, but the reconstituted committee granted approval without affording fresh opportunity of personal hearing to parties, resulting in gross violation of right to personal hearing. The High Court held that any authority exercising discretionary power must apply its mind to facts and not act mechanically. The approval was granted without reasons, necessitating fresh reconsideration by a new committee after hearing parties afresh on the proposal. The High Court directed constitution of a fresh committee to hear parties and take appropriate decision on the proposal, without changing committee's composition, affording opportunity of personal hearing and filing written submissions.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
