Functional comparability under TNMM supported exclusion of ITeS comparables with R&D, intangibles, diversified operations, or unavailable segmental da...
Functional comparability governs selection of support-service and IT-enabled service comparables, with verification required for unresolved data and m...
Tribunal held Adjudicating Authority's order cryptic, failing to examine appellants' defense regarding legitimate procurement and supply of gold as business transaction. Authority did not evaluate evidence u/s 108, authenticity of duty-paid invoices, or assayer's disclaimer on foreign origin. Passing common order without appreciating individual facts and evidence amounts to non-application of mind, violating principles of natural justice. Matter remanded to Original Authority for fresh adjudication as impugned order lacked reasoning, not a speaking order. Appeal allowed by way of remand to Adjudicating Authority.
Tribunal held Adjudicating Authority's order cryptic, failing to examine appellants' defense regarding legitimate procurement and supply of gold as business transaction. Authority did not evaluate evidence u/s 108, authenticity of duty-paid invoices, or assayer's disclaimer on foreign origin. Passing common order without appreciating individual facts and evidence amounts to non-application of mind, violating principles of natural justice. Matter remanded to Original Authority for fresh adjudication as impugned order lacked reasoning, not a speaking order. Appeal allowed by way of remand to Adjudicating Authority.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Join Channel 
