<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Gold trade defense overlooked, invoices&#039; authenticity unexamined. Cryptic order lacking reasoning, facts ignored.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82531</link>
    <description>Tribunal held Adjudicating Authority&#039;s order cryptic, failing to examine appellants&#039; defense regarding legitimate procurement and supply of gold as business transaction. Authority did not evaluate evidence u/s 108, authenticity of duty-paid invoices, or assayer&#039;s disclaimer on foreign origin. Passing common order without appreciating individual facts and evidence amounts to non-application of mind, violating principles of natural justice. Matter remanded to Original Authority for fresh adjudication as impugned order lacked reasoning, not a speaking order. Appeal allowed by way of remand to Adjudicating Authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2024 08:15:25 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2024 08:15:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=775418" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Gold trade defense overlooked, invoices&#039; authenticity unexamined. Cryptic order lacking reasoning, facts ignored.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82531</link>
      <description>Tribunal held Adjudicating Authority&#039;s order cryptic, failing to examine appellants&#039; defense regarding legitimate procurement and supply of gold as business transaction. Authority did not evaluate evidence u/s 108, authenticity of duty-paid invoices, or assayer&#039;s disclaimer on foreign origin. Passing common order without appreciating individual facts and evidence amounts to non-application of mind, violating principles of natural justice. Matter remanded to Original Authority for fresh adjudication as impugned order lacked reasoning, not a speaking order. Appeal allowed by way of remand to Adjudicating Authority.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2024 08:15:25 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82531</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>