Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Petition filed under Article 226 challenging non-constitution of Tribunal and seeking stay on recovery of tax. State authorities acknowledged non-constitution and issued notification providing limitation period for appeal before Tribunal shall commence only after President/State President assumes office. Held, subject to deposit of 20% of remaining disputed tax amount, petitioner entitled to statutory benefit of stay u/s 112(9) and cannot be deprived due to State's failure to constitute Tribunal. Recovery of balance amount and steps taken deemed stayed. Petition disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.