Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Rejection of transaction value declared by appellant was improper as it lacked cogent and comparable evidence from contemporaneous imports. Adjudicating authority failed to consider appellant's evidence on contemporaneous lower-value imports and provide details of higher adopted values. Valuation rules were not followed systematically for re-determining assessable value. Penalty imposed on appellant's partner u/s 114AA lacked requisite ingredients. Impugned order set aside, appeal allowed by Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal.
Rejection of transaction value declared by appellant was improper as it lacked cogent and comparable evidence from contemporaneous imports. Adjudicating authority failed to consider appellant's evidence on contemporaneous lower-value imports and provide details of higher adopted values. Valuation rules were not followed systematically for re-determining assessable value. Penalty imposed on appellant's partner u/s 114AA lacked requisite ingredients. Impugned order set aside, appeal allowed by Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
