https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82140 Rejection of transaction value declared by appellant was improper as it lacked cogent and comparable evidence from contemporaneous imports. Adjudicating authority failed to consider appellant's evidence on contemporaneous lower-value imports and provide details of higher adopted values. Valuation rules were not followed systematically for re-determining assessable value. Penalty imposed on appellant's partner u/s 114AA lacked requisite ingredients. Impugned order set aside, appeal allowed by Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal. en-us Fri, 11 Oct 2024 08:58:05 +0530 Fri, 11 Oct 2024 08:58:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82140 Rejection of transaction value declared by appellant was improper as it lacked cogent and comparable evidence from contemporaneous imports. Adjudicating authority failed to consider appellant's evidence on contemporaneous lower-value imports and provide details of higher adopted values. Valuation rules were not followed systematically for re-determining assessable value. Penalty imposed on appellant's partner u/s 114AA lacked requisite ingredients. Impugned order set aside, appeal allowed by Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal. Highlights Customs Fri, 11 Oct 2024 08:58:05 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82140