Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The adjudicating authority classified the goods 'Bleach-9' manufactured by the assessee under chapter sub-heading 25.05, claiming NIL rate of duty, based on technical opinions stating it is raw clay/washed clay and not Activated Clay/Earth. The opinions mentioned that clay washed with water and dried is not termed 'Activated Clay,' and its properties remain the same as natural clay. The department did not adduce any evidence contradicting these findings, which formed the basis for classifying 'Bleach-9' under Tariff heading 25.05. As no fresh evidence was provided to challenge the orders, the Appellate Tribunal dismissed the department's appeal, upholding the classification under 25.05.
The adjudicating authority classified the goods 'Bleach-9' manufactured by the assessee under chapter sub-heading 25.05, claiming NIL rate of duty, based on technical opinions stating it is raw clay/washed clay and not Activated Clay/Earth. The opinions mentioned that clay washed with water and dried is not termed 'Activated Clay,' and its properties remain the same as natural clay. The department did not adduce any evidence contradicting these findings, which formed the basis for classifying 'Bleach-9' under Tariff heading 25.05. As no fresh evidence was provided to challenge the orders, the Appellate Tribunal dismissed the department's appeal, upholding the classification under 25.05.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
