<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tariff classification dispute: Bleaching clay termed &#039;raw clay&#039; attracts NIL duty.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81355</link>
    <description>The adjudicating authority classified the goods &#039;Bleach-9&#039; manufactured by the assessee under chapter sub-heading 25.05, claiming NIL rate of duty, based on technical opinions stating it is raw clay/washed clay and not Activated Clay/Earth. The opinions mentioned that clay washed with water and dried is not termed &#039;Activated Clay,&#039; and its properties remain the same as natural clay. The department did not adduce any evidence contradicting these findings, which formed the basis for classifying &#039;Bleach-9&#039; under Tariff heading 25.05. As no fresh evidence was provided to challenge the orders, the Appellate Tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeal, upholding the classification under 25.05.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 14 Sep 2024 08:24:38 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Sep 2024 08:24:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=768160" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tariff classification dispute: Bleaching clay termed &#039;raw clay&#039; attracts NIL duty.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81355</link>
      <description>The adjudicating authority classified the goods &#039;Bleach-9&#039; manufactured by the assessee under chapter sub-heading 25.05, claiming NIL rate of duty, based on technical opinions stating it is raw clay/washed clay and not Activated Clay/Earth. The opinions mentioned that clay washed with water and dried is not termed &#039;Activated Clay,&#039; and its properties remain the same as natural clay. The department did not adduce any evidence contradicting these findings, which formed the basis for classifying &#039;Bleach-9&#039; under Tariff heading 25.05. As no fresh evidence was provided to challenge the orders, the Appellate Tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeal, upholding the classification under 25.05.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Sep 2024 08:24:38 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81355</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>