Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Penalty levied u/s 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance with documentary evidence requirements was challenged by the assessee, citing COVID-19 restrictions as a reasonable cause. The Tribunal held that in the prevailing pandemic situation, it was unreasonable for tax authorities to expect strict compliance from the assessee. The failure to furnish information/documents during the reassessment proceedings was attributable to the subsistence of COVID-19, which prevented effective compliance. Demanding documentary evidence to prove the reasonable cause of COVID-19 restrictions suggested non-application of mind by the authorities. The Tribunal relied on the Supreme Court's recognition of COVID-19 restrictions and held that the pandemic situation, along with the apex court's order, formed a reasonable cause u/s 273B, exculpating the assessee from penalty u/s 272A(1)(d). Consequently, the penalty order was set aside as unwarranted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.