Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty imposed for failure to comply with notices issued under section 142(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was sustainable when the assessee pleaded COVID-19 related reasonable cause under section 273B of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The non-compliance with the notices was not disputed, but the notices were issued during the subsistence of the COVID-19 pandemic and the resulting restrictions. Section 273B exempts penalty where the assessee shows reasonable cause for the failure, and the prevailing pandemic situation was treated as a matter of public knowledge not requiring separate documentary proof. In light of the exceptional restrictions and the Supreme Court's suo motu exclusion of the COVID period for limitation purposes, the failure to furnish information was attributable to reasonable cause and could not justify penalty under section 272A(1)(d) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Conclusion: The penalty was unsustainable and was deleted; the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a statutory default occurred during the COVID-19 lockdown and restrictions, the pandemic itself could constitute reasonable cause under section 273B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 so as to bar penalty under section 272A(1)(d) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.