Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Respondents initiated action under Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) based on alleged illegal sand mining generating proceeds of crime, without specifying scheduled offence investigated by other agency or determining actual proceeds. Court held respondents cannot assume jurisdiction under PMLA and attach properties in absence of registered case for scheduled offence resulting in proceeds of crime dealt with by petitioners. Mere suspicion of illegal money generation from illegal mining is insufficient. Provisional Attachment Orders quashed as respondents lacked jurisdiction to initiate PMLA action.
Respondents initiated action under Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) based on alleged illegal sand mining generating proceeds of crime, without specifying scheduled offence investigated by other agency or determining actual proceeds. Court held respondents cannot assume jurisdiction under PMLA and attach properties in absence of registered case for scheduled offence resulting in proceeds of crime dealt with by petitioners. Mere suspicion of illegal money generation from illegal mining is insufficient. Provisional Attachment Orders quashed as respondents lacked jurisdiction to initiate PMLA action.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.