Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

Illegal sand mining suspicion alone can't trigger PMLA attachment. Scheduled offence case & proceeds determination mandatory.

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Respondents initiated action under Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) based on alleged illegal sand mining generating proceeds of crime, without specifying scheduled offence investigated by other agency or determining actual proceeds. Court held respondents cannot assume jurisdiction under PMLA and attach properties in absence of registered case for scheduled offence resulting in proceeds of crime dealt with by petitioners. Mere suspicion of illegal money generation from illegal mining is insufficient. Provisional Attachment Orders quashed as respondents lacked jurisdiction to initiate PMLA action.....