Faceless assessment and registration procedures are updated through electronic communication, revised recovery rules, extended deadlines, and replacem...
Risk-based selective vessel boarding requires accurate declarations and preserves master and agent liability where physical inspections are not select...
Permanent-establishment reassessment cannot revisit scrutinised disclosures; extended reopening fails without undisclosed material facts and within st...
The High Court addressed a case involving a violation of natural justice as the petitioner did not respond to prior notices leading to the disputed order. Discrepancies in credit amounts were noted. The Court, acknowledging the petitioner as a small dealer, granted partial relief by annulling the order and sending the case back to the respondent for fresh consideration within two months. The petitioner was required to deposit 30% of the disputed tax within 30 days and reply to the show cause notices. The petition was disposed of through remand.
The High Court addressed a case involving a violation of natural justice as the petitioner did not respond to prior notices leading to the disputed order. Discrepancies in credit amounts were noted. The Court, acknowledging the petitioner as a small dealer, granted partial relief by annulling the order and sending the case back to the respondent for fresh consideration within two months. The petitioner was required to deposit 30% of the disputed tax within 30 days and reply to the show cause notices. The petition was disposed of through remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
