Faceless assessment and registration procedures are updated through electronic communication, revised recovery rules, extended deadlines, and replacem...
Risk-based selective vessel boarding requires accurate declarations and preserves master and agent liability where physical inspections are not select...
Permanent-establishment reassessment cannot revisit scrutinised disclosures; extended reopening fails without undisclosed material facts and within st...
The case involves determining whether a process amounts to manufacture for excise duty purposes and if the appellant is eligible for the Small Scale Industry (SSI) exemption. The Appellate Tribunal referred to legal precedents emphasizing that mere change in goods does not constitute manufacture unless a new product emerges. The tribunal observed that the appellant's reprocessing of waste oils into lubricating oils did not amount to manufacture under Chapter Note 4 of Chapter 27. Consequently, the appellant was not liable to pay excise duty and could avail the SSI exemption under Notification No. 8/2003-CE. The appeal was partially allowed for verification of duty payment on reprocessed oil cleared as lubricants.
The case involves determining whether a process amounts to manufacture for excise duty purposes and if the appellant is eligible for the Small Scale Industry (SSI) exemption. The Appellate Tribunal referred to legal precedents emphasizing that mere change in goods does not constitute manufacture unless a new product emerges. The tribunal observed that the appellant's reprocessing of waste oils into lubricating oils did not amount to manufacture under Chapter Note 4 of Chapter 27. Consequently, the appellant was not liable to pay excise duty and could avail the SSI exemption under Notification No. 8/2003-CE. The appeal was partially allowed for verification of duty payment on reprocessed oil cleared as lubricants.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.