Mandatory textile export qualifiers distinguish flame-retardant fabrics from other listed fabrics for automated identification under the textiles ince...
Personal liberty safeguards restrict arrest after court-directed GST appearance, requiring interim release where authorities overreach pending proceed...
Alternative statutory remedy and delay bar GST writ challenges despite pending rectification, while distinct subject matter permits parallel proceedin...
The case involved a petition for condonation of delay in filing an appeal before the NCLAT. The petitioner, a bank, did not apply for a certified copy of the impugned order within the time limitation. The NCLAT held that adherence to the I&B Code, 2016 is mandatory, and the law of limitation bars the remedy but does not extinguish the right. The tribunal emphasized that equities cannot override clear rules. The petitioner's reasons for delay, such as seeking legal advice and festivals, were deemed insufficient. The NCLAT concluded that no sufficient cause was shown for condoning the 3-day delay, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.
The case involved a petition for condonation of delay in filing an appeal before the NCLAT. The petitioner, a bank, did not apply for a certified copy of the impugned order within the time limitation. The NCLAT held that adherence to the I&B Code, 2016 is mandatory, and the law of limitation bars the remedy but does not extinguish the right. The tribunal emphasized that equities cannot override clear rules. The petitioner's reasons for delay, such as seeking legal advice and festivals, were deemed insufficient. The NCLAT concluded that no sufficient cause was shown for condoning the 3-day delay, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
