Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The Appellate Tribunal addressed two key issues. Firstly, u/s 69A, the AO added sales to the assessee's income due to lack of evidence, despite the assessee providing relevant documents and taking steps against GST fraud. The Tribunal found no need for addition as sales were lower than purchases under the relevant GST number, dismissing the Revenue's appeal. Secondly, the AO's addition for bogus purchases was dismissed as statements relied upon were from previous years, and the assessee provided evidence during assessment proceedings. The Tribunal ruled that AO's findings were not based on current year transactions, dismissing the Revenue's second ground.
The Appellate Tribunal addressed two key issues. Firstly, u/s 69A, the AO added sales to the assessee's income due to lack of evidence, despite the assessee providing relevant documents and taking steps against GST fraud. The Tribunal found no need for addition as sales were lower than purchases under the relevant GST number, dismissing the Revenue's appeal. Secondly, the AO's addition for bogus purchases was dismissed as statements relied upon were from previous years, and the assessee provided evidence during assessment proceedings. The Tribunal ruled that AO's findings were not based on current year transactions, dismissing the Revenue's second ground.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
