<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Sales added to income u/s 69A due to lack of evidence. Assessee proved innocence with docs &amp; steps. No addition warranted.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78354</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal addressed two key issues. Firstly, u/s 69A, the AO added sales to the assessee&#039;s income due to lack of evidence, despite the assessee providing relevant documents and taking steps against GST fraud. The Tribunal found no need for addition as sales were lower than purchases under the relevant GST number, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. Secondly, the AO&#039;s addition for bogus purchases was dismissed as statements relied upon were from previous years, and the assessee provided evidence during assessment proceedings. The Tribunal ruled that AO&#039;s findings were not based on current year transactions, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s second ground.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2024 07:57:29 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2024 07:57:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=756010" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Sales added to income u/s 69A due to lack of evidence. Assessee proved innocence with docs &amp; steps. No addition warranted.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78354</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal addressed two key issues. Firstly, u/s 69A, the AO added sales to the assessee&#039;s income due to lack of evidence, despite the assessee providing relevant documents and taking steps against GST fraud. The Tribunal found no need for addition as sales were lower than purchases under the relevant GST number, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. Secondly, the AO&#039;s addition for bogus purchases was dismissed as statements relied upon were from previous years, and the assessee provided evidence during assessment proceedings. The Tribunal ruled that AO&#039;s findings were not based on current year transactions, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s second ground.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2024 07:57:29 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78354</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>