Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
The ITAT Delhi held that denial of foreign tax credit u/s 90...
Foreign tax credit u/s 90 even if form 67 filed belatedly, is allowable subject to verification by the AO. Assessee entitled to claim relief as per DTAA.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The ITAT Delhi held that denial of foreign tax credit u/s 90 solely for not filing Form 67 before original tax return u/s 139(1) is incorrect. Assessee can claim credit per DTAA even if Form 67 is filed with revised return. CIT (A) erred in not considering the claim before AO. Following Goetze (India) Ltd. case, claim is admitted for justice. Issue remitted to AO for consideration based on documents submitted. Assessee's appeal allowed for statistical purposes.
The ITAT Delhi held that denial of foreign tax credit u/s 90 solely for not filing Form 67 before original tax return u/s 139(1) is incorrect. Assessee can claim credit per DTAA even if Form 67 is filed with revised return. CIT (A) erred in not considering the claim before AO. Following Goetze (India) Ltd. case, claim is admitted for justice. Issue remitted to AO for consideration based on documents submitted. Assessee's appeal allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.