Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of TP Adjustment - Comparable selection - determination of arm’s length prices (ALP) - The High Court observed that the dissimilarity in products sold and their respective turnovers could significantly impact the profitability of an entity. Despite acknowledging significant differences and accepting the appellant's arguments, the ITAT failed to entirely exclude Modicare. The Court considered this a vital infirmity and directed the ITAT to re-examine the appropriateness of including Modicare and the functional difference in marketing strategy between the entities.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
