Faceless assessment and registration procedures are updated through electronic communication, revised recovery rules, extended deadlines, and replacem...
Risk-based selective vessel boarding requires accurate declarations and preserves master and agent liability where physical inspections are not select...
Permanent-establishment reassessment cannot revisit scrutinised disclosures; extended reopening fails without undisclosed material facts and within st...
Rectification u/s. 154 - claim of the assessee that the CPC, Bengaluru in the intimation issued u/s. 143(1) had wrongly taken its income under the head "Profit and gains from the business or profession" at Much Higher Amount instead of Rs. Nil and raised a consequential demand towards tax and interest(s). The Tribunal examined the circumstances and found that since the CPC accepted the income as declared in the revised return, there was no apparent mistake in the record. The rejection of the rectification application was deemed appropriate. The ITAT also observed that the application was filed after the limitation period, further strengthening the rejection decision.
Rectification u/s. 154 - claim of the assessee that the CPC, Bengaluru in the intimation issued u/s. 143(1) had wrongly taken its income under the head "Profit and gains from the business or profession" at Much Higher Amount instead of Rs. Nil and raised a consequential demand towards tax and interest(s). The Tribunal examined the circumstances and found that since the CPC accepted the income as declared in the revised return, there was no apparent mistake in the record. The rejection of the rectification application was deemed appropriate. The ITAT also observed that the application was filed after the limitation period, further strengthening the rejection decision.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
