Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Dishonour of Cheque - Petitioner is an agent of the accused no. 1 firm - vicarious liability of the petitioner - It noted that there were no specific allegations against the petitioner except being labeled as an agent. - The High court found that the offense under Section 138 of the Act was not made out against the petitioner. - It observed that the complaints failed to establish that the petitioner was in charge of or responsible for the conduct of the business of Laycana - The complaint against the petitioner quashed.
Dishonour of Cheque - Petitioner is an agent of the accused no. 1 firm - vicarious liability of the petitioner - It noted that there were no specific allegations against the petitioner except being labeled as an agent. - The High court found that the offense under Section 138 of the Act was not made out against the petitioner. - It observed that the complaints failed to establish that the petitioner was in charge of or responsible for the conduct of the business of Laycana - The complaint against the petitioner quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
