https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75003 Dishonour of Cheque - Petitioner is an agent of the accused no. 1 firm - vicarious liability of the petitioner - It noted that there were no specific allegations against the petitioner except being labeled as an agent. - The High court found that the offense under Section 138 of the Act was not made out against the petitioner. - It observed that the complaints failed to establish that the petitioner was in charge of or responsible for the conduct of the business of Laycana - The complaint against the petitioner quashed. en-us Mon, 19 Feb 2024 07:31:50 +0530 Mon, 19 Feb 2024 07:31:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75003 Dishonour of Cheque - Petitioner is an agent of the accused no. 1 firm - vicarious liability of the petitioner - It noted that there were no specific allegations against the petitioner except being labeled as an agent. - The High court found that the offense under Section 138 of the Act was not made out against the petitioner. - It observed that the complaints failed to establish that the petitioner was in charge of or responsible for the conduct of the business of Laycana - The complaint against the petitioner quashed. Highlights Indian Laws Mon, 19 Feb 2024 07:31:50 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75003