Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Validity of Assessment cum Penalty cum Interest Order - There is no denial of the fact that the petitioner is disputing correctness of the amounts that was arrived at by the 1st respondent. It is well settled under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, this Court cannot go into factual aspects. Further, there is no dispute that the petitioner has a right of Appeal under Section 107 of the CGST Act, 2017. - HC
Validity of Assessment cum Penalty cum Interest Order - There is no denial of the fact that the petitioner is disputing correctness of the amounts that was arrived at by the 1st respondent. It is well settled under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, this Court cannot go into factual aspects. Further, there is no dispute that the petitioner has a right of Appeal under Section 107 of the CGST Act, 2017. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
