Preventive suspension requires an immediate continuing threat and cannot become indefinite without inquiry, fresh evidence, or proportionate safeguard...
Revision u/s 263 - violation of the provisions of Section 13(1) (c) - The least that the AO was called upon to do was to require the assessee to make good his claim that the amount was sourced from Kulwant Kaur Kukreja Educational Society. The violation of Section 13(1) (c) of the Income Tax Act also required examination after examination of the first aspect as aforesaid. - PCIT directed to administratively examine whether any action is called for against the AO in the light of the manner in which he has conducted himself while dealing with the proceedings after issuance of the notices under Section 143(2) and Section 142(1) of the Income Tax Act. - HC
Revision u/s 263 - violation of the provisions of Section 13(1) (c) - The least that the AO was called upon to do was to require the assessee to make good his claim that the amount was sourced from Kulwant Kaur Kukreja Educational Society. The violation of Section 13(1) (c) of the Income Tax Act also required examination after examination of the first aspect as aforesaid. - PCIT directed to administratively examine whether any action is called for against the AO in the light of the manner in which he has conducted himself while dealing with the proceedings after issuance of the notices under Section 143(2) and Section 142(1) of the Income Tax Act. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
