Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Profiteering - purchase of Stayfree Sanitary Napkins - allegation is that reduction in the rate of Input Tax Credit has not been passed y commensurate reduction of the price - the benefit of reduction in the tax rate has not been passed on to the recipients by way of commensurate reduction in the prices by the Respondent in terms of Section 171 (1) of the CGST Act, 2017 during the above period. - This Authority as per the provisions of Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017, determines the profiteered amount as Rs. 9,84,354/- - NAPA
Profiteering - purchase of Stayfree Sanitary Napkins - allegation is that reduction in the rate of Input Tax Credit has not been passed y commensurate reduction of the price - the benefit of reduction in the tax rate has not been passed on to the recipients by way of commensurate reduction in the prices by the Respondent in terms of Section 171 (1) of the CGST Act, 2017 during the above period. - This Authority as per the provisions of Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017, determines the profiteered amount as Rs. 9,84,354/- - NAPA
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.