Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2022 (6) TMI 1253 - NAPA - GST

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Manufacturer violated Section 171(1) CGST Act by not passing GST reduction benefit on sanitary napkins to consumers NAPA held that respondent violated Section 171(1) of CGST Act, 2017 by failing to pass on benefit of tax rate reduction from 12% to nil on sanitary ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Manufacturer violated Section 171(1) CGST Act by not passing GST reduction benefit on sanitary napkins to consumers

                            NAPA held that respondent violated Section 171(1) of CGST Act, 2017 by failing to pass on benefit of tax rate reduction from 12% to nil on sanitary napkins effective 27.07.2018. Authority determined profiteered amount of Rs. 9,84,354 for period 27.07.2018 to 31.03.2019 based on DGAP investigation showing respondent increased base prices instead of reducing them. Respondent directed to deposit profiteered amount with 18% interest in Consumer Welfare Fund within three months as recipients unidentifiable. No penalty imposed as Section 171(3A) provisions came into force after the violation period.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Violation of Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017.
                            2. Quantum of profiteering.

                            Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Violation of Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017:

                            The case revolves around the allegation that the Respondent did not pass on the benefit of a tax rate reduction from 12% to Nil on Stayfree Sanitary Napkins, effective from 27.07.2018, as per Notification No. 19/2018-CTR dated 26.07.2018. The DGAP's investigation confirmed that the Respondent increased the base price of the product when the tax rate was reduced, thereby benefiting by Rs. 19,61,033/- during the period from 27.07.2018 to 31.03.2019. This was deemed a violation of Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017, which mandates passing on the benefit of tax rate reduction to consumers.

                            2. Quantum of Profiteering:

                            The DGAP was directed to investigate specific issues and submit a detailed report. The investigation revealed that the Respondent had increased the base price of the sanitary napkins post the tax rate reduction, leading to profiteering. The DGAP's report dated 31.12.2020 recalculated the profiteered amount, considering common input tax credit (ITC) reversals and discounts.

                            Detailed Findings:

                            a. Common Input Tax Credit:
                            The DGAP verified the Respondent's claim of reversing common credit of Rs. 13,07,118/-. The ITC reversal was found to be correct and proportionately distributed to the turnover of sanitary napkins, impacting the base price calculation for profiteering.

                            b. Discounts:
                            The Respondent, being a retailer, provided discounts at the point of sale, reflected in the invoices. The DGAP concluded that profiteering should be calculated on the taxable value (transaction value) as per Section 15 (3) of the CGST Act, 2017.

                            c. Profiteering Amount Calculation:
                            The DGAP computed the profiteered amount separately for closing and fresh stocks. For the closing stock, the profiteered amount was Rs. 5,37,208/-, and for the fresh stock, it was Rs. 4,47,146/-. The total profiteered amount was Rs. 9,84,354/-.

                            Respondent's Contentions:

                            The Respondent argued that the total common credit reversal should be adjusted against the alleged profiteering. They also contended that the benefit of common credit reversal should be given for both closing and fresh stocks. However, the DGAP clarified that the common credit reversal was correctly apportioned and accounted for in the profiteering calculation.

                            Authority's Decision:

                            The Authority determined that the Respondent violated Section 171 (1) of the CGST Act, 2017, by not passing on the benefit of the tax rate reduction. The profiteered amount was confirmed as Rs. 9,84,354/-, which the Respondent was directed to deposit along with 18% interest in the Consumer Welfare Funds of the Central and State Governments. The Respondent's liability for penalty under Section 171 (3A) could not be imposed retrospectively as the provision came into force after the period in question.

                            Conclusion:

                            The Authority concluded that the Respondent must deposit the profiteered amount with interest in the Consumer Welfare Funds within three months. The jurisdictional Commissioners of CGST/SGST were directed to ensure compliance and report back within four months. The order was passed within the limitation period as per the Supreme Court's directions on the exclusion of the limitation period due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found