Introducing the βIn Favour Ofβ filter in Case Laws.
- βοΈ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- π Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws β


Just a moment...
Introducing the βIn Favour Ofβ filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws β


Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
Unexplained expenditure u/s 69C - The AO has not brought any evidence on record which can demonstrate that assessee has incurred expenses for development work. - There was no evidence with the AO to prove or even indicate that such amount was spent by assessee on the development of land in concern which was sold. AO made addition purely on surmises and conjecture. - AT