<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Assessing Officer Lacks Evidence for Expenses u/s 69C; Additions Based on Assumptions, Not Proof.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=58408</link>
    <description>Unexplained expenditure u/s 69C - The AO has not brought any evidence on record which can demonstrate that assessee has incurred expenses for development work. - There was no evidence with the AO to prove or even indicate that such amount was spent by assessee on the development of land in concern which was sold. AO made addition purely on surmises and conjecture. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2021 14:47:10 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2021 14:47:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=647167" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Assessing Officer Lacks Evidence for Expenses u/s 69C; Additions Based on Assumptions, Not Proof.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=58408</link>
      <description>Unexplained expenditure u/s 69C - The AO has not brought any evidence on record which can demonstrate that assessee has incurred expenses for development work. - There was no evidence with the AO to prove or even indicate that such amount was spent by assessee on the development of land in concern which was sold. AO made addition purely on surmises and conjecture. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2021 14:47:10 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=58408</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>