Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Revision u/s 263 - assessee’s case selected for limited scrutiny under CASS - the Ld. PCIT could not have invoked jurisdiction u/s 263 of the Act because he could not have held the AO’s order to be erroneous because the AO was justified in not enquiring in to the issue of Insurance Premium (Keyman Policy) since the AO has gone as per the dictum of CBDT circular on the subject. - AT
Revision u/s 263 - assessee’s case selected for limited scrutiny under CASS - the Ld. PCIT could not have invoked jurisdiction u/s 263 of the Act because he could not have held the AO’s order to be erroneous because the AO was justified in not enquiring in to the issue of Insurance Premium (Keyman Policy) since the AO has gone as per the dictum of CBDT circular on the subject. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
