<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>PCIT&#039;s Jurisdiction Challenge u/s 263 Overruled; AO&#039;s Decision on Keyman Policy Insurance Premium Upheld.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=57999</link>
    <description>Revision u/s 263 - assessee’s case selected for limited scrutiny under CASS - the Ld. PCIT could not have invoked jurisdiction u/s 263 of the Act because he could not have held the AO’s order to be erroneous because the AO was justified in not enquiring in to the issue of Insurance Premium (Keyman Policy) since the AO has gone as per the dictum of CBDT circular on the subject. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2021 12:47:48 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 May 2021 12:47:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=644455" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>PCIT&#039;s Jurisdiction Challenge u/s 263 Overruled; AO&#039;s Decision on Keyman Policy Insurance Premium Upheld.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=57999</link>
      <description>Revision u/s 263 - assessee’s case selected for limited scrutiny under CASS - the Ld. PCIT could not have invoked jurisdiction u/s 263 of the Act because he could not have held the AO’s order to be erroneous because the AO was justified in not enquiring in to the issue of Insurance Premium (Keyman Policy) since the AO has gone as per the dictum of CBDT circular on the subject. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2021 12:47:48 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=57999</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>