Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
Insolvency and BankruptcyOctober 22, 2020Case LawsTri
Initiation of CIRP - It can be concluded that the claim arising out of grant of licence to use immovable property does not fall in the category of goods or services including employment and is also not a debt for the payment of dues arising under any law for the time being in force and payable to the Central Government, any State Government, or any Local Authority, as defined under Section 5(21) of IBC, 2016. Thus, the amount claimed in the present petition is not an unpaid operational debt and therefore the Application cannot be allowed. - Tri
Initiation of CIRP - It can be concluded that the claim arising out of grant of licence to use immovable property does not fall in the category of goods or services including employment and is also not a debt for the payment of dues arising under any law for the time being in force and payable to the Central Government, any State Government, or any Local Authority, as defined under Section 5(21) of IBC, 2016. Thus, the amount claimed in the present petition is not an unpaid operational debt and therefore the Application cannot be allowed. - Tri
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.