Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Dishonor of Cheque - onus to prove that loan was advanced - When the respondent himself has not deposed before the trial Court that he has not borrowed money from the appellant, presumption under Section 139 of the Act, 1881 will survive and remain exist and corroboration to the statement of the appellant is not required. - HC
Dishonor of Cheque - onus to prove that loan was advanced - When the respondent himself has not deposed before the trial Court that he has not borrowed money from the appellant, presumption under Section 139 of the Act, 1881 will survive and remain exist and corroboration to the statement of the appellant is not required. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.