<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Respondent Must Prove No Loan Given to Overcome Section 139 Presumption in Cheque Dishonor Case.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=52121</link>
    <description>Dishonor of Cheque - onus to prove that loan was advanced - When the respondent himself has not deposed before the trial Court that he has not borrowed money from the appellant, presumption under Section 139 of the Act, 1881 will survive and remain exist and corroboration to the statement of the appellant is not required. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2020 11:30:07 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2020 11:30:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=605833" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Respondent Must Prove No Loan Given to Overcome Section 139 Presumption in Cheque Dishonor Case.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=52121</link>
      <description>Dishonor of Cheque - onus to prove that loan was advanced - When the respondent himself has not deposed before the trial Court that he has not borrowed money from the appellant, presumption under Section 139 of the Act, 1881 will survive and remain exist and corroboration to the statement of the appellant is not required. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2020 11:30:07 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=52121</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>