Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Stay of demand - ACIT requiring to deposit 20% of the outstanding demand - only in ‘exceptional circumstances’ the discretion of the AO could be interfered with by the superior authority i.e either the assessment order is unreasonably high-pitched or a genuine hardship is likely to be caused to the Assessee - Petitioner has failed to make out a case of genuine hardship - no stay of the demand
Stay of demand - ACIT requiring to deposit 20% of the outstanding demand - only in ‘exceptional circumstances’ the discretion of the AO could be interfered with by the superior authority i.e either the assessment order is unreasonably high-pitched or a genuine hardship is likely to be caused to the Assessee - Petitioner has failed to make out a case of genuine hardship - no stay of the demand
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Join Channel 
