<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Petitioner fails to show genuine hardship; 20% deposit requirement by ACIT upheld due to lack of exceptional circumstances.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=48072</link>
    <description>Stay of demand - ACIT requiring to deposit 20% of the outstanding demand - only in ‘exceptional circumstances’ the discretion of the AO could be interfered with by the superior authority i.e either the assessment order is unreasonably high-pitched or a genuine hardship is likely to be caused to the Assessee - Petitioner has failed to make out a case of genuine hardship - no stay of the demand</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 20 Jul 2019 09:20:59 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Jul 2019 09:20:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=580232" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Petitioner fails to show genuine hardship; 20% deposit requirement by ACIT upheld due to lack of exceptional circumstances.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=48072</link>
      <description>Stay of demand - ACIT requiring to deposit 20% of the outstanding demand - only in ‘exceptional circumstances’ the discretion of the AO could be interfered with by the superior authority i.e either the assessment order is unreasonably high-pitched or a genuine hardship is likely to be caused to the Assessee - Petitioner has failed to make out a case of genuine hardship - no stay of the demand</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 20 Jul 2019 09:20:59 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=48072</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>