Just a moment...

⚠✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Keyword Search :
AI Tools : New
Ask tax questions in natural language. Powered by AI trained on the TaxTMI legal database. Use AI Tools ➞
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
╳
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
✕
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
❮ Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search ❯
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text ❯
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----❯
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----❯
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----❯
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    August 6, 2026   Case LawsGST
    GST arrest safeguards require recorded necessity and credible material; alleged online gaming tax evasion arrest was upheld.
    August 6, 2026   Case LawsGST
    GST search procedures require de-sealing in the taxpayer's presence and any further search to follow statutory rules.
    August 6, 2026   Case LawsGST
    Pre-trial detention in fraudulent input tax credit prosecutions is not punitive; delayed trials may justify conditional bail.
    August 6, 2026   Case LawsGST
    Anticipatory bail in alleged input tax credit fraud was rejected as custodial interrogation remained necessary during investigation.
    August 6, 2026   Case LawsGST
    GST proceedings against a deceased proprietor are invalid, but lawful demand recovery may proceed against the legal heir.
    August 6, 2026   Case LawsGST
    Suppression of material facts undermined coercion claim over GST payments, prompting costs and an explanatory affidavit.
    August 6, 2026   Case LawsGST
    Portal communication of GST notices failed statutory requirements, requiring fresh adjudication after a meaningful opportunity to reply and be heard.
    August 6, 2026   Case LawsGST
    Independent ballast loading is cargo handling, not composite supply or works contract, and attracts the applicable service tax rate.
    August 6, 2026   Case LawsIncome Tax
    Unexplained expenditure requires proof that funding sources remain unexplained, not merely allegations of bogus purchase transactions.
    August 6, 2026   Case LawsIncome Tax
    Special audit fee liability shifted to the Union where the audit followed an Assessing Officer's order.
    August 6, 2026   Case LawsIncome Tax
    High Court tax appeal classification requires Black Money Act appeals against Tribunal orders to be registered as Tax Appeals.
    August 6, 2026   Case LawsIncome Tax
    Corroboration of seized loose sheets is essential; unsupported fee additions and extrapolations cannot survive factual scrutiny.
    August 6, 2026   Case LawsIncome Tax
    Reassessment on suspicious transaction reports fails where partner capital withdrawals lack material showing income escapement or bogus entries.
    August 6, 2026   Case LawsIncome Tax
    Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
    August 6, 2026   Case LawsIncome Tax
    Unauthorised supervisory approval vitiates a survey-based assessment by undermining the Assessing Officer's independent quasi-judicial discretion.
    August 6, 2026   Case LawsIncome Tax
    Depreciation option claims with full disclosure and bona fide revision do not establish inaccurate income particulars for penalty.
    August 6, 2026   Case LawsIncome Tax
    International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
    August 6, 2026   Case LawsIncome Tax
    Asset-based escaped-income satisfaction is mandatory for extended Section 153C jurisdiction; a cash-transaction note alone invalidates the assessment.
    August 6, 2026   Case LawsIncome Tax
    Arm's length pricing for corporate guarantees and foreign-currency receivables applies a reduced commission, LIBOR benchmark, and credit period.
    August 6, 2026   Case LawsIncome Tax
    Agricultural land character at transfer determines capital-gains treatment despite purchaser obtaining later non-agricultural-use permission.
❮
❯
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Open Link
    Highlights
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
    August 6, 2026   Case Laws GST
    GST arrest safeguards require recorded necessity and credible material; alleged online gaming tax evasion arrest was upheld.
    August 6, 2026   Case Laws GST
    GST search procedures require de-sealing in the taxpayer's presence and any further search to follow statutory rules.
    August 6, 2026   Case Laws GST
    Pre-trial detention in fraudulent input tax credit prosecutions is not punitive; delayed trials may justify conditional bail.
    August 6, 2026   Case Laws GST
    Anticipatory bail in alleged input tax credit fraud was rejected as custodial interrogation remained necessary during investigation.
    August 6, 2026   Case Laws GST
    GST proceedings against a deceased proprietor are invalid, but lawful demand recovery may proceed against the legal heir.
    August 6, 2026   Case Laws GST
    Suppression of material facts undermined coercion claim over GST payments, prompting costs and an explanatory affidavit.
    August 6, 2026   Case Laws GST
    Portal communication of GST notices failed statutory requirements, requiring fresh adjudication after a meaningful opportunity to reply and be heard.
    August 6, 2026   Case Laws GST
    Independent ballast loading is cargo handling, not composite supply or works contract, and attracts the applicable service tax rate.
    August 6, 2026   Case Laws Income Tax
    Unexplained expenditure requires proof that funding sources remain unexplained, not merely allegations of bogus purchase transactions.
    August 6, 2026   Case Laws Income Tax
    Special audit fee liability shifted to the Union where the audit followed an Assessing Officer's order.
    August 6, 2026   Case Laws Income Tax
    High Court tax appeal classification requires Black Money Act appeals against Tribunal orders to be registered as Tax Appeals.
    August 6, 2026   Case Laws Income Tax
    Corroboration of seized loose sheets is essential; unsupported fee additions and extrapolations cannot survive factual scrutiny.
    August 6, 2026   Case Laws Income Tax
    Reassessment on suspicious transaction reports fails where partner capital withdrawals lack material showing income escapement or bogus entries.
    August 6, 2026   Case Laws Income Tax
    Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amendment.
    August 6, 2026   Case Laws Income Tax
    Unauthorised supervisory approval vitiates a survey-based assessment by undermining the Assessing Officer's independent quasi-judicial discretion.
    August 6, 2026   Case Laws Income Tax
    Depreciation option claims with full disclosure and bona fide revision do not establish inaccurate income particulars for penalty.
    August 6, 2026   Case Laws Income Tax
    International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability governs software service margins.
    August 6, 2026   Case Laws Income Tax
    Asset-based escaped-income satisfaction is mandatory for extended Section 153C jurisdiction; a cash-transaction note alone invalidates the assessment.
    August 6, 2026   Case Laws Income Tax
    Arm's length pricing for corporate guarantees and foreign-currency receivables applies a reduced commission, LIBOR benchmark, and credit period.
    August 6, 2026   Case Laws Income Tax
    Agricultural land character at transfer determines capital-gains treatment despite purchaser obtaining later non-agricultural-use permission.

    Highlights

    Back

    All Highlights

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      Highlights

      Home› Highlights › Income Tax › 2018 › November, 2018 › This
      Back

      All Highlights

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters
      Income Tax

      Penalty made u/s 271D - loan transaction between husband and...

      Penalty Imposed for Loan Between Spouses Overturned: Section 269SS Exemption for Husband-Wife Transactions Ignored by Officer.

      Contents
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Print Options

      Income TaxNovember 29, 2018Case LawsAT
      Penalty made u/s 271D - loan transaction between husband and wife - while levying the penalty u/s. 271D AO did not appreciate the fact that the provisions of section 269SS are not applicable on the loan transaction between husband and wife.
      View Source View

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax
      Next ➔