Business expenditure and depreciation rules allow operational outgoings while limiting disallowances for personal elements and unsupported third-party...
Compromise-and-arrangement extensions may accommodate debt assignment where creditor commercial judgment supports value maximisation and avoids proced...
Delayed-payment surcharge is not taxable tolerance consideration where it penalises default, while meter testing follows electricity distribution trea...
Sufficient cause for delayed revenue income-tax appeals requires bona fides, due diligence and a credible explanation; otherwise limitation bars appea...
Page of 4905
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1241 to 1260 of 98083 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The test of human probabilities permits tax authorities to look...
Human-probability test defeats political donation deduction where banking records mask accommodation-entry fund layering and evidence shows non-genuine contributions.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The test of human probabilities permits tax authorities to look beyond documentary evidence and banking-channel payments when assessing the real nature of a political contribution. Donation receipts and bank payments did not prove genuineness where investigation material, statements, bank-trail analysis, and the recipient party's modus operandi showed systematic fund layering for accommodation entries. The apparent transaction was not a genuine political contribution; the claimed deduction was denied, the consequential addition sustained, and the assessee's appeal dismissed.
The test of human probabilities permits tax authorities to look beyond documentary evidence and banking-channel payments when assessing the real nature of a political contribution. Donation receipts and bank payments did not prove genuineness where investigation material, statements, bank-trail analysis, and the recipient party's modus operandi showed systematic fund layering for accommodation entries. The apparent transaction was not a genuine political contribution; the claimed deduction was denied, the consequential addition sustained, and the assessee's appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4905 
