<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Human-probability test defeats political donation deduction where banking records mask accommodation-entry fund layering and evidence shows non-genuine contributions.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104147</link>
    <description>The test of human probabilities permits tax authorities to look beyond documentary evidence and banking-channel payments when assessing the real nature of a political contribution. Donation receipts and bank payments did not prove genuineness where investigation material, statements, bank-trail analysis, and the recipient party&#039;s modus operandi showed systematic fund layering for accommodation entries. The apparent transaction was not a genuine political contribution; the claimed deduction was denied, the consequential addition sustained, and the assessee&#039;s appeal dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 08:16:32 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 08:16:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=925753" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Human-probability test defeats political donation deduction where banking records mask accommodation-entry fund layering and evidence shows non-genuine contributions.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104147</link>
      <description>The test of human probabilities permits tax authorities to look beyond documentary evidence and banking-channel payments when assessing the real nature of a political contribution. Donation receipts and bank payments did not prove genuineness where investigation material, statements, bank-trail analysis, and the recipient party&#039;s modus operandi showed systematic fund layering for accommodation entries. The apparent transaction was not a genuine political contribution; the claimed deduction was denied, the consequential addition sustained, and the assessee&#039;s appeal dismissed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 08:16:32 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104147</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>