Fake-invoice penalties remain available where taxpayer admissions and records establish unsupported input tax credit claims and false GST documentatio...
Works contract classification applies to permanently installed fire-protection systems, while earthwork and obsolete IGST concessions remain unavailab...
Professional fee recovery for GST refund representation succeeds where direct engagement, fee acknowledgement, and authority are established despite c...
Transfer pricing of intra-group support services requires prescribed benchmarking; unsupported nil valuation and alternate business-expense disallowan...
Availability of a statutory appellate remedy against GST registration cancellation and rejection of revocation ordinarily precludes adjudication of factual disputes in writ jurisdiction. Appeals lay against both orders; therefore, factual contentions remained open for determination by the appellate authority. Where the revocation-rejection order was undated but served on 22 August 2026, the service date was directed to be treated as the order date for pursuing the appellate remedy. The taxpayer was permitted to file appeals against both orders within two weeks, for expeditious disposal.
Availability of a statutory appellate remedy against GST registration cancellation and rejection of revocation ordinarily precludes adjudication of factual disputes in writ jurisdiction. Appeals lay against both orders; therefore, factual contentions remained open for determination by the appellate authority. Where the revocation-rejection order was undated but served on 22 August 2026, the service date was directed to be treated as the order date for pursuing the appellate remedy. The taxpayer was permitted to file appeals against both orders within two weeks, for expeditious disposal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
