Fake-invoice penalties remain available where taxpayer admissions and records establish unsupported input tax credit claims and false GST documentatio...
Works contract classification applies to permanently installed fire-protection systems, while earthwork and obsolete IGST concessions remain unavailab...
Professional fee recovery for GST refund representation succeeds where direct engagement, fee acknowledgement, and authority are established despite c...
Transfer pricing of intra-group support services requires prescribed benchmarking; unsupported nil valuation and alternate business-expense disallowan...
E-way bill values in job work movements cannot, without independent evidence, be treated as a job worker's taxable turnover. E-way bills record goods movement, and their generation by a person involved in the transaction is not determinative where consignor and consignee particulars are correctly declared. Goods sent by a principal for processing and returned thereafter do not establish a taxable supply by the job worker, who paid tax on job work charges. A mismatch between e-way bill data and GST returns, absent proof of supply or tax evasion, could not sustain the demand. The Tribunal therefore set aside the demand, interest and penalty.
E-way bill values in job work movements cannot, without independent evidence, be treated as a job worker's taxable turnover. E-way bills record goods movement, and their generation by a person involved in the transaction is not determinative where consignor and consignee particulars are correctly declared. Goods sent by a principal for processing and returned thereafter do not establish a taxable supply by the job worker, who paid tax on job work charges. A mismatch between e-way bill data and GST returns, absent proof of supply or tax evasion, could not sustain the demand. The Tribunal therefore set aside the demand, interest and penalty.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
